     F I D O N E W S --       Volume 13, Number 47          18 November 1996
     +----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
     |  The newsletter of the     |   ISSN 1198-4589 Published by:          |
     |    FidoNet community       |   "FidoNews"                            |
     |          _                 |        1-904-409-7040    [1:1/23]       |
     |         /  \               |                                         |
     |        /|oo \              |                                         |
     |       (_|  /_)             |                                         |
     |        _`@/_ \    _        |                                         |
     |       |     | \   \\       |   Editor:                               |
     |       | (*) |  \   ))      |        Christopher Baker  1:18/14       |
     |       |__U__| /  \//       |                                         |
     |        _//|| _\   /        |                                         |
     |       (_/(_|(____/         |                                         |
     |             (jm)           |     Newspapers should have no friends.  |
     |                            |                    -- JOSEPH PULITZER   |
     +----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+
     |               Submission address: FidoNews Editor 1:1/23             |
     +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
     |  MORE addresses:                                                     |
     |                                                                      |
     |    submissions=> cbaker84@digital.net                                |
     +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
     |    For  information,   copyrights,   article   submissions,          |
     |    obtaining copies of FidoNews or the internet gateway FAQ          |
     |    please refer to the end of this file.                             |
     +----------------------------------------------------------------------+


             SIXTY HORSES FOUND WEDGED UP CHIMNEY!


                        Table of Contents
     1. EDITORIAL  ................................................  1
        Standards and proposals  ..................................  1
     2. ARTICLES  .................................................  2
        Destroy the Bastard, says I!  .............................  2
        Proposed update to fts-0005  ..............................  2
        Action is a meausurement of convictions:  ................. 14
        Region 13 has no RC  ...................................... 15
        Credibility?  ............................................. 16
        Fidonet on Win95  ......................................... 16
     3. COLUMNS  .................................................. 17
        Fidonet In Europe  ........................................ 17
     4. GETTING TECHNICAL  ........................................ 18
        FTS-0005 - The Nodelist Standard  ......................... 18
     5. COORDINATORS CORNER  ...................................... 29
        Nodelist-statistics as seen from Zone-2 for day 320  ...... 29
     6. NET HUMOR  ................................................ 30
        More C humor?  ............................................ 30
        Deep thoughts?  ........................................... 32
     7. NOTICES  .................................................. 35
        Future History  ........................................... 35
     8. FIDONEWS PUBLIC-KEY  ...................................... 36
        This Space intentionally left blank?  ..................... 36
     9. FIDONEWS INFORMATION  ..................................... 37
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 1                   18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                                 EDITORIAL
     =================================================================


     Another Standard [FTS-0005] meets another proposal in this issue.

     No new Headline entries. Guess that was a QotW that went nowhere.

     Any ASCII art for the upcoming U.S. Thanksgiving Day Issue next
     week?

     Would anyone like to become a FidoNews interviewer and go out there
     and get some .BIO info from various FidoNet luminaries or maybe
     infamositers? [grin]

     C.B.


     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 2                   18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                                 ARTICLES
     =================================================================


     Destroy the Bastard, says I!
     Fredric Rice 1:218/890.0 (frice@stbbs.com)
     The Skeptic Tank (818) 335-9601

     In issue 13-46, Cindy Ingersoll (1:2623/71; wraith@styx.ios.com)
     voices some difficulties which, I must opine, seem to indicate
     a growing phenomena in FidoNet:  When a lazy bastard is asked
     politely enough to do his fucking job, there appears to be some
     which adopt a resentful attitude at the audacity of being asked
     and endlessly refuse just on general principles.

     What fun, Cindy!  Now's your chance!  Distribute a formal note
     to all nodes in your network or region (wherever the problem is)
     calling for an election.  Since the source of your difficulties
     come from someone you claim wasn't elected in the first place,
     you don't have the embarrassing unpleasantness (or the fun) of
     THROWING THE BUMS OUT! so it should be fairly simple to elect
     someone willing to do the job.  Your log of unanswered and
     ignored messages you transmitted should show your network that
     there is a need for some rework.

     Some many years ago there were some snotty-nosed upstarts here
     in Net 102 (wipe your nose, Pablo) which tried to bowdlerize
     the benignant beau who ran Net 102 Bedlam on the grounds that
     requests for nodelist updates were ignored and such yet when
     the network was polled the consensus was that our beloved NC
     was doing his job and doing it well.  (And we all _do_ love
     him.)  <wink> <wink>

     Poll your net or region, Cindy, and find out what the consensus
     is and, if the clown is the lazy bastard you say he is, and
     he wasn't appointed officially, there should be an easy solution
     to your problem (not to mention you would be preempting other
     problems before they can begin.)  If everyone else finds no
     complaint, however, you is outta luck.


     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     A couple of widgies added to fts-0005
     by Lee Kindness, 2:259/7, wangi@frost3.demon.co.uk

     Well fts-0005 will be included in this issue of Fidonews, so here
     is a new revision that i submitted to the FTSC a couple of months
     ago (no action taken yet). I was just going to include the diffs,
     but these didn't work too well (too hard to follow) so you can
     have two versions of fts-0005 in this issue ;)

     The modem flags could do with a major overhaul and a lot has
     been going on about this in ENET.SYSOP and NET_DEV, i didn't
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 3                   18 Nov 1996


     touch them too much as i don't have a firm technical knowledge
     of them...

     Remember, this is currently a proposed spec...

     Document: FTS-0005
     Version:  004
     Date:     August 10, 1996


                            The Distribution Nodelist

                             Originally by Ben Baker
          Amended by Rick Moore, 1:115/333, February 5, 1989
          Amended by David Nugent, 3:632/348, February 27, 1996
          Amended by Lee Kindness, 2:259/7, August 4, 1996


         Copyright 1986-1996 by the FidoNet Technical Standards Committee.
         All rights reserved. Duplication and/or distribution permitted
         for non-commercial purposes only.

         This document supersedes and replaces the document known under
     |   the names of FSC002, FSC-0002, and FTS-0002. Significant changes,
     |   which excludes mere formatting changes, to revision 3 of this
     |   document have been marked by '|' in the leftmost column.

         This document defines the format and content of the nodelist for
         the Public FidoNet Network (PFN) as published on Friday of each
         week. This format is historically known as the "St. Louis nodelist
         format".

         The PFN is an international network of independently owned
         electronic mail systems, most with interlocking electronic
         bulletin board systems. The distribution nodelist, or simply
         "nodelist", is the glue which holds the network together. It is
         the PFN's "phone book" and it defines the top-level network
         structure and is the means by which FidoNet retains its integrity
         as a point-to-point mail network.


     THE NODELIST

         The nodelist is published as an ASCII text file named
         NODELIST.nnn, where nnn is a three digit number representing the
         day-of-year of the Friday publication date, with zeros filling
         positions to the left if necessary. This file is packed into a
         archive file named NODELIST.?nn, where 'nn' are the last two
         digits of day-of-year, and the character at the position of the
         '?' indicating the type of compression used. Conventions as to
         which compression method is used for the distributed nodelist is
         a matter of local policy and is usually determined by each zone's
     |   Zone Coordinator. Common conventions are:

     |        NODELIST.Znn  :   Zip
     |        NODELIST.Ann  :  Arc
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 4                   18 Nov 1996


     |        NODELIST.Lnn  :  Lzh/Lha
     |        NODELIST.Jnn  :  ARJ

         As stated above, NODELIST.nnn is an ASCII text file. It contains
         two kinds of lines; comment lines and data lines. Each line is
         terminated with an ASCII carriage return and line feed character
         sequence, and contains no trailing white-space (spaces, tabs,
         etc.). The file is terminated with a DOS end-of-file character
         (character value 26 decimal, or "control-Z").

         Comment lines contain a semicolon (;) in the first character
         position followed by zero or more alphabetic characters called
         "interest flags". A program which processes the nodelist may use
         comment interest flags to determine the disposition of a comment
         line. The remainder of a comment line (with one exception,
         treated below) is free-form ASCII text. There are five types of
         comments flags:

             ;S This is of particular interest to Sysops
             ;U This is of particular interest to BBS users
             ;F This should appear in any formatted "Fido List"
             ;A This is of general interest (shorthand for ;SUF)
             ;E This is an error message inserted by the nodelist generator
             ; This comment may be ignored by a nodelist processor

         The first line of a nodelist is a special comment line containing
         identification data for the particular edition of the nodelist.
         The following is an example of the first line of a nodelist:

     ;A FidoNet Nodelist for Friday, July 3, 1987 -- Day number 184 : 15943

         This line contains the general interest flag, the day, date, and
         three-digit (zero-filled) day-of-year number of publication, and
         ends with a 5 digit decimal number with leading zeros, if
         necessary. This number is the decimal representation of a check
         value derived as follows:

             Beginning with the first character of the second line, a
             16 bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is calculated for the
             entire file, including carriage return and line feed
             characters, but not including the terminating EOF
             character. The check polynomial used is the same one used
             for many file transfer protocols:

                         2**16 + 2**12 + 2**5 + 2**0

         The CRC may be used to verify that the file has not been edited.
         The importance of this will become evident in the discussion of
         NODEDIFF, below. CRC calculation techniques are well documented
         in various technical references, and will not be treated further
         here.

         The content of the remaining comments in the nodelist are
         intended to be informative. Beyond the use of interest flags for
         distribution, a processing program need not have any interest in
         them.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 5                   18 Nov 1996


         A nodelist data line contains eight variable length "fields"
         separated by commas (,). No space characters are allowed in a
         data line, and underscore characters are used in lieu of spaces.
         The term "alphanumeric character" is defined as the portion of
         the ASCII character set from 20 hex through 7E hex, inclusive.
         The following discussion defines the contents of each field in a
         data line.


       Field 1: Keyword

         The keyword field may be empty, or may contain one of the
         following:

         Zone

             Begins the definition of a geographic zone and define its
             coordinator. All the data lines following a line with the
             "Zone" keyword down to, but not including, the next
             occurrence of a "Zone" keyword, are regions, networks, and
             nodes within the defined zone.  Node entries defined
             immediately after the "Zone" keyword and before the next
             region or host entry are known as zone administrative nodes.
             These are allocated by the Zone Coordinator for use by nodes
             in the entire zone; for example, mail gateways between
             FidoNet zones.

         Region

             Begins the definition of a geographic region and defines
             its coordinator. All the data lines following a line with
             the "Region" keyword down to,  but not including,  the
             next occurrence of a "Zone",  "Region",  or "Host"
             keyword, are independent nodes within the defined region.

         Host

             Begins the definition of a local network and defines its
             network coordinator. All the data lines following a line
             with the Host keyword down to, but not including, the
             next occurrence of a "Zone", "Region",  or "Host" keyword,
             are local nodes, members of the defined local network.

         Hub

             Begins the definition of a routing sub-unit within a
             multi-level local network. The hub is the routing focal
             point for nodes listed below it until the next occurrence
             of a "Zone", "Region", "Host", or "Hub" keyword. The hub
             entry MUST be a redundant entry, with a unique number, for
             one of the nodes listed below it, within its hub segment.
             This is necessary because some nodelist processors
             eliminate these entries in all but the local network.

         Pvt

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 6                   18 Nov 1996


             Defines a private node with unlisted number. Private nodes
             are only allowed as members of local networks.

     |   Point

     |       Defines a private point off a node. Should not be used in
     |       the Fidonet nodelist, but rather private 'pointlists',
     |       local net level nodelists and nodelists in other Fidonet
     |       technology networks.

         Hold

             Defines a node which is temporarily down. Mail may be sent
             to it and is held by its host or coordinator.

         Down

             Defines a node which is not operational. Mail may NOT be
             sent to it. This keyword may not be used for longer than
             two weeks on any single node, at which point the "down"
             node is to be removed from the nodelist.

         <empty>

             The field contains no text (not the sequence "<empty>"),
             and defines a normal node entry.

         Only one of these may be used in any individual data line.


     | Field 2: Zone/Region/Net/Node/Point number

         This field contains only numeric digits and is a number in the
         range of 0 to 32767. If the line had the "Zone", "Region", "Host"
     |   or "Point" keyword, the number is the zone, net, region or point
         number, and the node has an implied node number of 0. Otherwise,
         the number is the node number. The zone number, region or net
         number, and the node number, taken together, constitute a node's
         FidoNet address.

         Zone numbers must be unique. Region or net numbers must be unique
         within their zone, hub numbers unique be within their net, node
         numbers unique within their net (and region, for regional
         independent nodes, zone for zone administrative entries).
         Duplicate node numbers under different hubs within the same net
         are not
     |   allowed. Point numbers must be unique within their node.


       Field 3: Node name

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces, and
         a comma delimits the end of the field. This is the name by which
         the node is known, usually as determined by the node or the
     |   coordinator responsible for compiling the segment. For zone,
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 7                   18 Nov 1996


     |   region and host entries this field should indicate its (rough)
     |   geographical area.


       Field 4: Location

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces. This
         field contains the location of the node. It is usually expressed
         as the primary local location (town, suburb, city, etc.) plus an
         identifier of the regional geopolitical administrative district
         (state, province, department, county, etc.). Wherever possible,
         standard postal abbreviations for the major regional district
         should be used (IL, BC, NSW, etc.).


       Field 5: Sysop name

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces. This
     |   is the name of the SYSTEM OPERATOR, entries such as "postmaster",
     |   "uucp" and aliases are not permitted.


       Field 6: Phone number

         This field contains at least three and usually four numeric sub-
         fields separated by dashes (-). The fields are country code,
         city or area code, exchange code, and number. The various parts
         of the phone number are frequently used to derive cost and
         routing information, as well as what number is to be dialed. A
         typical example of the data in a phone number field is 1-800-555-
         1212, corresponding to country 1 (USA), area 800
         (inbound WATS), exchange 555, and number 1212.

         Alternatively, this field may contain the notation
     |   "-Unpublished-" in the case of a private node or point. In this
     |   case, the keyword "Pvt" or "Point" must appear at the start of
         the line.


       Field 7: Baud rate

         This field contains one of the values: 300, 1200, 2400, 9600,
         19200, or 38400.

         This baud rate is indicative only of the maximum baud rate that
         may be expected when connecting to a node and is generally of use
         only where a calling node needs to adjust the baud rate used to
         dial to the caller's modem speed in order to achieve a
         connection, a requirement that with modem technology available in
         1996 is rarely if ever needed. This information is largely
         superseded by modem protocol flags (see next section) where any
         two nodes using a common protocol may have other expectations
         with regards to actual transfer rates. Use of the baud rate field
     |   alone is therefore depreciated. FSC-0091 should be consulted with
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 8                   18 Nov 1996


     |   regard to the special use of '300'


       Field 8 - Flags

         This optional field contains data about the specific operation of
         the node, such as file requests, modem protocol supported, etc.
         Any text following the seventh comma on a data line is taken
         collectively to be the flags field. The required format is zero
         or more sub-fields, separated by commas. Each sub-field consists
     |   of a flag, possibly followed by a value. Entries here are update
     |   to or succeeded in the epilogue of the Nodelist. The flags field
     |   has no maximum size.

         The following flags define special operating conditions:

            Flag    Meaning

            CM      Node accepts mail 24 hours a day
            MO      Node does not accept human callers
            LO      Node accepts calls only from valid listed node
                    numbers in the current FidoNet nodelist


         The following flags define modem protocols supported:

            Flag    Meaning

            V21     ITU-T V21      300 bps full duplex
            V22     ITU-T V22     1200 bps full duplex
            V29     ITU-T V29     9600 bps half duplex
            V32     ITU-T V32     9600 bps full duplex
            V32b    ITU-T V32bis 14400 bps full duplex
            V33     ITU-T V33
            V34     ITU-T V34    28800 bps full duplex

     |      V110L   ITU-T V.110 19k2 async ('low').
     |      V110H   ITU-T V.110 38k4 async ('high').
     |      V120L   ITU-T V.120 56k async, layer 2 framesize 259,
     |              window 7, modulo 8.
     |      V120H   ITU-T V.120 64k async, layer 2 framesize 259,
     |              window 7, modulo 8.
     |      X75     ITU-T X.75 SLP (single link procedure)
     |              with 64kbit/s B channel;
     |              layer 2 max.framesize 2048, window 2,
     |              non-ext.mode (modulo 8);
     |              layer 3 transparent (no packet layer).
     |      ISDN    Other ISDN configurations. Use *only* if none
     |              of the above fits

     |      NOTE:   ISDN nodes which do not accept modem calls must use
     |              '300' in the baud field, see FSC-0091 for more details.

            H96     Hayes V9600
            HST     USR Courier HST
            H14     USR Courier HST up to 14.4Kbps
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 9                   18 Nov 1996


            H16     USR Courier HST up to 16.8Kbps
            PEP     Packet Ensemble Protocol
            CSP     Compucom Speedmodem
     |      V32T    V.32 Terbo mode (implies V32b)
            VFC     Rockwell's V.Fast Class
     |      ZYX     Zyxel 16.8 Kbps (implies V32b & V42b)
     |      Z19     Zyxel 19.2 Kbps (implies V32b, V42b & ZYX)

            NOTE:   Many V22 modems also support Bell 212A.

     |   If no modem flag is given, ITU-T V.22 is assumed within zone 2
     |   for 1200bps, while Bell 212A is assumed for 1200 bps systems in
     |   other zones, ITU-T V22bis is assumed for 2400 bps systems.

     |   A separate modem capability flag should not be used when it can be
     |   determined by the modem flag. For instance, a modem flag of HST
     |   implies MNP. V32B implies V32 and V42B implies V42. MNP,HST and
     |   V32,V32B and V42,V42B flag pairs are unnecessary. H14 implies HST
     |   and H16 implies H14 as well as V42b.


         The following flags define type of error correction available. A
         separate error correction flag should not be used when the error
         correction type can be determined by the modem flag. For
         instance, a modem flag of HST implies MNP, V32b implies V32 and
         V42b implies V42. Therefore MNP+HST, H14+MNP, H16+MNP, V32+V32b
         and V42+V42b flag pairs are redundant and should not be used.

             Flag    Meaning

             MNP     Microcom Networking Protocol error correction
             V42     ITU-T LAP-M error correction w/fallback to MNP 1-4
             V42b    ITU-T LAP-M error correction w/fallback to MNP 1-5
     |               (V42 implied)


         The following flags define the type(s) of compression of mail
     |   packets supported plus message encoding.

             Flag    Meaning

             MN      No compression supported
     |       ENC     The node accepts inbound encrypted mail

             NOTE:   While FidoNet nodes usually exchange mail
                     using a variety of different file compression
                     formats negotiated between individual systems, the
                     presence of this flag indicates the INABILITY TO
                     RECEIVE MAIL compressed using the SEA ARC version 5
                     compression format and/or named according to the
                     ARCmail 0.6 mail bundle naming method. This is, by
                     convention, the most common mail compression format
                     in use within FidoNet. The presence of this flag
                     would normally indicate that all mail should be sent
                     uncompressed unless there is some overriding
                     arrangement with the receiving system.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 10                  18 Nov 1996


         The following flags indicate the types of file and file update
         requests supported.

             Flag    Meaning

             XA      Bark and WaZOO file/update requests
             XB      Bark file/update requests, WaZOO file requests
             XC      Bark file requests, WaZOO file file/update
             XP      Bark file/update requests
             XR      Bark and WaZOO file requests
             XW      WaZOO file requests
             XX      WaZOO file/update requests


         The following flag defines gateways to other domains (mail
         networks).

             Flag    Meaning

             Gx..x   Gateway to domain 'x..x', where 'x..x` is a string
                     of alphanumeric characters.

             NOTE:   Valid values for 'x..x' are assigned by the FidoNet
                     International Coordinator or the person appointed as
                     Internetworking Coordinator by the FidoNet
                     International Coordinator. Current valid values of
                     'x..x' may usually be found in the notes at the end
                     of the current FidoNet nodelist. The most common
                     gateway flag is "GUUCP", to denote a gateway to the
                     Internet mail system that gates on behalf of the
                     fidonet.org internet domain.


         The following flags define the dedicated mail periods supported.
         They have the form "#nn" or "!nn" where nn is the UTC hour the
         mail period begins, '#' indicates Bell 212A compatibility, and
         '!' indicates incompatibility with Bell 212A.

             Flag    Meaning

             #01     Zone 5 mail hour (01:00 - 02:00 UTC)
             #02     Zone 2 mail hour (02:30 - 03:30 UTC)
             #03     Zone 4 mail hour (08:00 - 09:00 UTC)
             #09     Zone 1 mail hour (09:00 - 10:00 UTC)
             #18     Zone 3 mail hour (18:00 - 19:00 UTC)
             #20     Zone 6 mail hour (20:00 - 21:00 UTC)

             NOTE:   When applicable, the mail period flags may be strung
                     together with no intervening commas, e.g.. "#02#09"
                     or "!02!09". Only mail hours other than that
                     standard within a node's zone should be given. Since
                     observance of mail hour within one's zone is
                     mandatory, it should not be indicated.

     |       Txx     Availability flag for non-CM nodes indicating the
     |               hours during which the node is available in addition
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 11                  18 Nov 1996


     |               to ZMH. This must be in accordance with the recommen-
     |               dations in FSC-0062 and the reference table reproduced
     |               below. ATTENTION : All times must be UTC!
     |
     |  +------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----+
     |  |Letter|Time||Letter|Time||Letter|Time||Letter|Time||Letter|Time|
     |  +------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----+
     |  |   A  |0000||   F  |0500||   K  |1000||   P  |1500||   U  |2000|
     |  |   a  |0030||   f  |0530||   k  |1030||   p  |1530||   u  |2030|
     |  |   B  |0100||   G  |0600||   L  |1100||   Q  |1600||   V  |2100|
     |  |   b  |0130||   g  |0630||   l  |1130||   q  |1630||   v  |2130|
     |  |   C  |0200||   H  |0700||   M  |1200||   R  |1700||   W  |2200|
     |  |   c  |0230||   h  |0730||   m  |1230||   r  |1730||   w  |2230|
     |  |   D  |0300||   I  |0800||   N  |1300||   S  |1800||   X  |2300|
     |  |   d  |0330||   i  |0830||   n  |1330||   s  |1830||   x  |2330|
     |  |   E  |0400||   J  |0900||   O  |1400||   T  |1900||      |    |
     |  |   e  |0430||   j  |0930||   o  |1430||   t  |1930||      |    |
     |  +------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----++------+----+


         The following flag defines user-specific values. If present,
         this flag MUST be the last flag present in a nodelist entry.

             Flag    Meaning

             Ux..x   A user-specified string, which may contain any
                     alphanumeric character except blanks. This string
                     may contain one to thirty-two characters of
                     information that may be used to add user-defined
                     data to a specific nodelist entry.

             NOTE:   Ux..x flags are the mechanism by which new flags may
                     be experimentally introduced into the nodelist for a
                     trial period to assess their worth. They are
                     therefore of a temporary nature, and after their
                     introduction they are eventually either promoted
                     to a non-U flag or dropped from use altogether.

     |   The FTSC recognizes that the FidoNet International Coordinator
     |   (IC) is the ultimate authority over what appears in the FidoNet
         nodelist. Also, FTSC is by definition a deliberative body, and
         adding or changing a flag may take a considerable amount of time.
         Therefore, the FidoNet International Coordinator may temporarily
         make changes or additions to the flags as defined in this
         document. The FidoNet International Coordinator will then consult
         with FTSC over the changes needed to this document to reflect
         these temporary changes.


         The following are examples of nodelist data lines:

         Host,102,SOCALNET,Los_Angeles_CA,Richard_Martz,1-213-874-
         9484,2400,XP ,101,Rainbow_Data,Culver_City_CA,Don_Brauns,1-213-
         204-2996,2400,


     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 12                  18 Nov 1996


     THE NODEDIFF

         With more than thirty-five thousand nodes as of this date (1996),
         the nodelist, even in archive form, is a document of substantial
         size. Since distribution of the nodelist occurs via electronic
         file transfer, this file is NOT routinely distributed. Instead,
         when a new nodelist is prepared weekly, it is compared with the
         previous week's nodelist, and a file containing only the
         differences is created and distributed.

         The distribution difference file, called NODEDIFF.nnn, where nnn
         is the day-of-year of publication, is actually an editing script
         which will transform the previous week's nodelist into the
         current nodelist. A definition of its format follows:

         The first line of NODEDIFF.nnn is an exact copy of the first line
         of LAST WEEK'S nodelist (i.e. the first line of the nodelist to
         which the current difference file applies). This is used as a
         first-level confidence check to insure that the correct file is
         being edited. The second and subsequent lines are editing
         commands and data.

         There are three editing commands and all have the same format:

       <command><number>

         <command> is a 1 letter command, one of A, C, or D.

         <number> is a decimal number greater than zero, and defines the
         number of lines to be operated on by the command. Each command
         appears on a line by itself. The commands have the following
         meanings:

             Ann     Add the following nn lines to the output file.
             Cnn     Copy nn unchanged lines from the input to the output
                     file.
             Dnn     Delete (or skip) nn lines from the input file.

         The following illustrate how the first few lines of a
         hypothetical NODEDIFF.213 might look:

             ;A Friday, July 25, 1986 -- Day number 206 : 27712
             D2
             A2
             ;A Friday, August 1, 1986 -- Day number 213 : 05060
             ;A
             C5

         This fragment illustrates all three editing commands. The first
         line is the first line from the previous nodelist, NODELIST.206.
         The next line says "delete the first two lines" from
         NODELIST.206. These are the identification line and the line
         following it. The next command says "add the next two lines" to
         NODELIST.213 at the "current" location. The two data lines are
         followed by a command which says "copy five unchanged lines" from
         NODELIST.206 to NODELIST.213. Notice that the first line added
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 13                  18 Nov 1996


         will ALWAYS contain the new nodelist CRC, so that the software
         applying the changes to the old nodelist may check the result of
         its editing.

         Since only the differences will be distributed, it is important
         to insure the accuracy of the newly created nodelist. This is the
         function of the CRC mentioned above. It is sufficient for a
         program designed to perform the above edits to pick the CRC value
         from the first line added to the output file, then compute the
         CRC of the rest of the output file. If the two CRCs do not agree,
         one of the input files has been corrupted. If they do agree, the
         probability is very high (but not 100%) that the output file is
         accurate.

         For actual distribution, NODEDIFF.nnn is packed into an archive
         file named NODEDIFF.?nn, where 'nn' are the last two digits of
         day-of-year, and '?' indicates the compression format used.


     NODELIST COMPILATION

         This section is included for tutorial reasons and is not intended
         as a definition of any specific method by which FidoNet MUST
         compile its weekly nodelist. It merely represents an attempt to
         document the method by which it currently does so. It is intended
         to be explanatory, and seeks to answer commonly asked questions,
         such as how the nodelist is compiled and where the information
         comes from, why the nodelists used in different FidoNet zones are
         not the same document, and why the difference file generated for
         use in one FidoNet zone cannot be applied to the nodelist
         generated for use in a different zone, even though the week
         numbers match.

         Nodelists are compiled via a distributed method, which follows
         the same structure as the FidoNet coordinator hierarchy. At the
         lowest level, network coordinators maintain a list of the nodes
         in their network and are responsible for the addition, removal
         and correction of individual node's listings in their "segment"
         (as portions of the full nodelist are called). In some larger
         networks, it is common for this job to be shared with hub
         coordinators appointed by the net coordinator, though the
         responsibility for those hub segments still remains with the
         network coordinator.

         At a nominated day during the week, before the regional level
         segment is submitted to the zone coordinator, individual net
         coordinators submit their segments to the regional coordinator
         who subsequently compiles these segments and transmits the merged
         copy to the zone coordinator. These are combined by the zone
         coordinator with the separate segments of other zones and
         compiled into that zone's version of the world nodelist. This
         world nodelist is then compared with the previous week's version,
         a difference file is generated and subsequently distributed
         throughout the zone.

         In some cases, in the interest of saving in transmission times
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 14                  18 Nov 1996


         and therefore costs, the compilation process itself may be better
         served by the submission of DIFFERENCE FILES rather than full
         net- or region-level segments. Each coordinator therefore retains
         a copy of the previously submitted segments and applies
         difference files to those to derive the new one. This process is
         exactly identical to the NODEDIFF/NODELIST scenario described
         earlier in this document, with the same first line and CRC
         validation method used to guard the integrity of the nodelist
         segments.

         For a number of reasons, it is important that publication of the
         nodelist be as timely as possible. These reasons include: the
         nodelist is a definitive list of valid FidoNet addresses that may
         receive mail, and must therefore be as correct and up-to-date as
         possible to save nodes the unnecessary expense of mail routed to
         possibly non-existing addresses; the nodelist contains the list
         of telephone numbers that may be called by any user of the
         FidoNet nodelist and should therefore be accurate so as not to
         unduly annoy owners of those phone numbers should a listed node
         go down and an unsuspecting telephone subscriber inherit the same
         telephone number.

         Given this constraint, the expense of international calls and the
         fact that FidoNet is a worldwide network that exists in many time
         zones, it may be unreasonable to expect the compilation of the
         nodelist to be delayed until each zone coordinator can transmit
         their most up-to-date zone segment to a central authority for
         compilation and subsequent redistribution in any week. For the
         sake of expedience, each zone instead maintains its own separate
         world nodelist which contains a compilation of the current zone's
         latest segments and including the most current copy to hand of
         all other FidoNet zone's segments. The zone level nodelist
         generated each week by each zone coordinator is then transmitted
         to all other zone coordinators for inclusion into their separate
         world nodelist as timing permits.

         In theory, then, the only difference between nodelists
         distributed in each zone in any week are accounted for by timing
         differences in the exchange of each zone's separate segment. In
         practice, other constraints may interfere with timeliness, such
         as the difficulty and expense of international telephonic
         communications. Also, another point of variance is introduced by
         the fact that each zone usually includes its own zone segment
         first into its world nodelist to assist - amongst other things -
         software that uses the nodelist for index generation. Some
         software in common use in FidoNet indexes the nodelist according
         to its sequential order (e.g. version 5 and 6 compiled nodelist
         formats), and including the current zone first before others will
         have a beneficial effect on software performance.

      -30-

     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     Action is a meausurement of convictions
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 15                  18 Nov 1996


             by Bob Moravsik 1:2606/583

          >Bob Morasvik writes in fnewsd45:
           >> make it my business.  By not filing a PC against me
           >> it is your admission that I'm right and you are wrong.
           >> My  NC is Sean Aldrich 1:2606/0...the lines are open.

          Then Lee Kindness whines in fnewsd46:

          >Oh, please! Can we not have a *discussion* without reverting
          >to this sort of rubbish! I will not waste any NC's time over a
          >thread in *Fidonews*, nor will I continue a discussion when this
          >is the view of one of the participants!

     The test of a persons credability and convictions occurs
     when they are "challenged" to put action to back their words.
     I gather then only retort to my well thought out analysis
     of why a zone echopol is a waste of time is Mr. Kindness'
     whinning that it is none of my business.  When challenged
     to back this up...WIMP OUT.

     OK Mr. Kindness fluff up your feathers, take your one distorted
     marble and live in the world of denial.  But try reading
     section one of policy 4.07.  That section is the linchpin of
     any local policy.  Disregard it and the policy will come
     tumbling down because it lacks a foundation.

     By not addressing the Section one issue it is your admission
     that you live inn this denial world.  Come on....give it a shot.
     Analyze Woodmorepol pursuant to Section 1.0.  Impress "us".

     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     Region 13 has no RC
        By Bob Moravsik

     A lot of you have read the plight of CIA trying to
     get back into the node list.  Messages to the RC
     have gone unanswered.  This is typical of Philip
     Dampier, RC13.  He communicates with his "buddies"
     and ignores the rest.   Region 13 is not coordinated,
     its split.  R13 a small group of nets under the "rule"
     of Dampier; R13A the rest of region 13.

     Time and time again, Dampier has issolated himself
     from the mainstream.  Why the ZC allows just one
     node to remain out of the nodelist is in itself
     pathetic.   Region 13 needs an enema and Dampier
     should be the first "turd" out !

     Any *C that allows a PC Or appeal to go over the
     30 days SHOULD RESIGN.  The nodelist might
     get smaller but those who remain will be of a higher
     quality then these waste products that can't get
     along with society.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 16                  18 Nov 1996


     Dampier....resign.




     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     Credibility?
     Seanette Blaylock, 1:206/2735, seanette@aol.com

     Rob Shinn does seem awfully determined to find unwarranted fault with
     U'NI-Net, doesn't he?

     Two minor points that I think reflect very unfavorably on Mr. Shinn's
     credibility on this subject:

     1) He refers to Cam DeBuck as "her". Cam is male, as anyone who has
     actually participated on U'NI-Net would know.

     2) By his own admission, Mr. Shinn has NOT participated on U'NI-Net.
     How can a non-participant on a given net have *any* credibility
     discussing that net's internal workings?

     Respectfully submitted,
     Seanette Blaylock

     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     Fine, original wimmin - aged 95
     by Lee Kindness, 2:259/7, lkindnes@csl.co.uk

     One of my points recently(-ish) moved to Win95 from the Amiga (which
     as many know has a great range of Fidonet programs). What he found was
     a platform void of any decent software (his opinion). FIPS is the only
     thing worth noting, but the evaluation versions method of delays has
     made his evaluation a nightmare ;)

     So, can anyone recommend a 'good' setup (be it one integrated program
     or separate editor, tosser, mailer et al), and please no DOS apps
     running in a console (when my point asked in a Win95 echo the general
     suggestion was Terminate...)! Answers to 2:259/7 please or just
     follow up in Fidonews...

     So may the eternal traffic cone enlighten your catum...

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 17                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                                  COLUMNS
     =================================================================


     FIDONET IN EUROPE
     -----------------
     by Dave Meikle (2:259/58.90 , rebeljambo@aol.com)

     Sorry about last week my machine crashed , but nothing happened
     anyway.  My new WWW page is at
     http://members.aol.com/rebeljambo/homepage.html.

     Rebemember the address to submit is EUROPE@2:259/58.90 or
     EUROPE@P90.F58.N259.Z2.FIDONET.ORG

     Dave

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 18                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                             GETTING TECHNICAL
     =================================================================


     [Part of a continuing series of FidoNet Technical Standards and
      Proposals being published here in numerical order. This is also
      part of our continuing FidoNet History series. It has been
      reformatted to 70 columns where necessary.] Ed.


      | Document: FTS-0005
      | Version:  003
      | Date:     February 7, 1996
      | Maintainer: David Nugent, 3:632/348@fidonet

                            The Distribution Nodelist

                             Originally by Ben Baker
            Amended by Rick Moore, 1:115/333@FidoNet, February 5, 1989
          Amended by David Nugent, 3:632/348@FidoNet, February 27, 1996

     |   Copyright 1986-1996 by the FidoNet Technical Standards Committee.
         All rights reserved. Duplication and/or distribution permitted
         for non-commercial purposes only.

         This document supersedes and replaces the document known under
     |   the names of FSC002, FSC-0002, and FTS-0002. Significant changes,
     |   which excludes mere formatting changes, to the previous version
     |   of this document have been "redlined" (marked with a vertical
     |   bar in the leftmost column).

         This document defines the format and content of the nodelist for
         the Public FidoNet Network (PFN) as published on Friday of each
     |   week. This format is historically known as the "St. Louis nodelist
     |   format".

         The PFN is an international network of independently owned
         electronic mail systems, most with interlocking electronic
         bulletin board systems. The distribution nodelist, or simply
         "nodelist", is the glue which holds the network together. It is
         the PFN's "phone book" and it defines the top-level network
     |   structure and is the means by which FidoNet retains its integrity
     |   as a point-to-point mail network.


     | THE NODELIST

         The nodelist is published as an ASCII text file named
         NODELIST.nnn, where nnn is a three digit number representing the
     |   day-of-year of the Friday publication date, with zeros filling
     |   positions to the left if necessary. This file is packed into a
     |   archive file named NODELIST.?nn, where 'nn' are the last two
     |   digits of day-of-year, and the character at the position of the
     |   '?' indicating the type of compression used. Conventions as to
     |   which compression method is used for the distributed nodelist is
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 19                  18 Nov 1996


     |   a matter of local policy and is usually determined by each zone's
     |   Zone Coordinator.

         As stated above, NODELIST.nnn is an ASCII text file. It contains
         two kinds of lines; comment lines and data lines. Each line is
         terminated with an ASCII carriage return and line feed character
         sequence, and contains no trailing white-space (spaces, tabs,
     |   etc.). The file is terminated with a DOS end-of-file character
     |   (character value 26 decimal, or "control-Z").

         Comment lines contain a semicolon (;) in the first character
         position followed by zero or more alphabetic characters called
         "interest flags". A program which processes the nodelist may use
         comment interest flags to determine the disposition of a comment
         line. The remainder of a comment line (with one exception,
     |   treated below) is free-form ASCII text. There are five types of
     |   comments flags:

     |       ;S This is of particular interest to Sysops
     |       ;U This is of particular interest to BBS users
     |       ;F This should appear in any formatted "Fido List"
     |       ;A This is of general interest (shorthand for ;SUF)
     |       ;E This is an error message inserted by the nodelist generator
     |       ; This comment may be ignored by a nodelist processor

         The first line of a nodelist is a special comment line containing
         identification data for the particular edition of the nodelist.
         The following is an example of the first line of a nodelist:

     ;A FidoNet Nodelist for Friday, July 3, 1987 -- Day number 184 : 15943

         This line contains the general interest flag, the day, date, and
     |   three-digit (zero-filled) day-of-year number of publication, and
         ends with a 5 digit decimal number with leading zeros, if
         necessary. This number is the decimal representation of a check
         value derived as follows:

             Beginning with the first character of the second line, a
             16 bit cyclic redundancy check (CRC) is calculated for the
             entire file, including carriage return and line feed
             characters, but not including the terminating EOF
             character. The check polynomial used is the same one used
             for many file transfer protocols:

                         2**16 + 2**12 + 2**5 + 2**0

         The CRC may be used to verify that the file has not been edited.
         The importance of this will become evident in the discussion of
         NODEDIFF, below. CRC calculation techniques are well documented
     |   in various technical references, and will not be treated further
         here.

         The content of the remaining comments in the nodelist are
         intended to be informative. Beyond the use of interest flags for
         distribution, a processing program need not have any interest in
         them.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 20                  18 Nov 1996


         A nodelist data line contains eight variable length "fields"
         separated by commas (,). No space characters are allowed in a
         data line, and underscore characters are used in lieu of spaces.
         The term "alphanumeric character" is defined as the portion of
         the ASCII character set from 20 hex through 7E hex, inclusive.
         The following discussion defines the contents of each field in a
         data line.


       Field 1: Keyword

         The keyword field may be empty, or may contain one of the
         following:

         Zone

             Begins the definition of a geographic zone and define its
             coordinator. All the data lines following a line with the
             "Zone" keyword down to, but not including, the next
             occurrence of a "Zone" keyword, are regions, networks, and
     |       nodes within the defined zone.  Node entries defined
     |       immediately after the "Zone" keyword and before the next
     |       region or host entry are known as zone adminstrative nodes.
     |       These are allocated by the Zone Coordinator for use by nodes
     |       in the entire zone; for example, mail gateways between
     |       FidoNet zones.

         Region

             Begins the definition of a geographic region and defines
             its coordinator. All the data lines following a line with
             the "Region" keyword down to,  but not including,  the
             next occurrence of a "Zone",  "Region",  or "Host"
             keyword, are independent nodes within the defined region.

         Host

             Begins the definition of a local network and defines its
     |       network coordinator. All the data lines following a line
             with the Host keyword down to, but not including, the
             next occurrence of a "Zone", "Region",  or "Host" keyword,
             are local nodes, members of the defined local network.

         Hub

             Begins the definition of a routing sub-unit within a
             multi-level local network. The hub is the routing focal
             point for nodes listed below it until the next occurrence
             of a "Zone", "Region", "Host", or "Hub" keyword. The hub
             entry MUST be a redundant entry, with a unique number, for
             one of the nodes listed below it, within its hub segment.
             This is necessary because some nodelist processors
             eliminate these entries in all but the local network.

         Pvt

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 21                  18 Nov 1996


             Defines a private node with unlisted number. Private nodes
             are only allowed as members of local networks.

         Hold

             Defines a node which is temporarily down. Mail may be sent
             to it and is held by its host or coordinator.

         Down

             Defines a node which is not operational. Mail may NOT be
             sent to it. This keyword may not be used for longer than
             two weeks on any single node, at which point the "down"
             node is to be removed from the nodelist.

         <empty>

     |       The field contains no text (not the sequence "<empty>"),
     |       and defines a normal node entry.

     |   Only one of these may be used in any individual data line.


       Field 2: Zone/Region/Net/Node number

         This field contains only numeric digits and is a number in the
         range of 0 to 32767. If the line had the "Zone", "Region", or
         "Host" keyword, the number is the zone, net, or region number,
         and the node has an implied node number of 0. Otherwise, the
         number is the node number. The zone number, region or net number,
         and the node number, taken together, constitute a node's FidoNet
         address.

         Zone numbers must be unique. Region or net numbers must be unique
         within their zone, hub numbers unique be within their net, node
     |   numbers unique within their net (and region, for regional
     |   independent nodes, zone for zone administrative entries).
         Duplicate node numbers under different hubs within the same net
         are not allowed.


       Field 3: Node name

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces, and
         a comma delimits the end of the field. This is the name by which
         the node is known, usually as determined by the node or the
         coordinator responsible for compiling the segment.


       Field 4: Location

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces. This
         field contains the location of the node. It is usually expressed
         as the primary local location (town, suburb, city, etc.) plus the
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 22                  18 Nov 1996


         identifier of the regional geopolitical administrative district
         (state, province, department, county, etc.). Wherever possible,
         standard postal abbreviations for the major regional district
         should be used (IL, BC, NSW, etc.).


       Field 5: Sysop name

         This field may contain any alphanumeric characters other than
         commas and spaces. Underscores are used to represent spaces. This
         is the name of the system operator.


       Field 6: Phone number

         This field contains at least three and usually four numeric
         sub-fields separated by dashes (-). The fields are country code,
         city or area code, exchange code, and number. The various parts
         of the phone number are frequently used to derive cost and
         routing information, as well as what number is to be dialed. A
         typical example of the data in a phone number field is
         1-800-555-1212, corresponding to country 1 (USA), area 800
         (inbound WATS), exchange 555, and number 1212.

         Alternatively, this field may contain the notation
         "-Unpublished-" in the case of a private node. In this case, the
     |   keyword "Pvt" must appear at the start of the line.


       Field 7: Baud rate

         This field contains one of the values: 300, 1200, 2400, 9600,
     |   19200, or 38400.

     |   This baud rate is indicative only of the maximum baud rate that
     |   may be expected when connecting to a node and is generally of use
     |   only where a calling node needs to adjust the baud rate used to
     |   dial to the caller's modem speed in order to achieve a
     |   connection, a requirement that with modem technology available in
     |   1996 is rarely if ever needed. This information is largely
     |   superseded by modem protocol flags (see next section) where any
     |   two nodes using a common protocol may have other expectations
     |   with regards to actual transfer rates. Use of the baud rate field
     |   alone is therefore depreciated.


       Field 8 - Flags

         This optional field contains data about the specific operation of
         the node, such as file requests, modem protocol supported, etc.
         Any text following the seventh comma on a data line is taken
         collectively to be the flags field. The required format is zero
         or more sub-fields, separated by commas. Each sub-field consists
         of a flag, possibly followed by a value.

         The following flags define special operating conditions:
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 23                  18 Nov 1996


            Flag    Meaning

            CM      Node accepts mail 24 hours a day
            MO      Node does not accept human callers
     |      LO      Node accepts calls only from valid listed node
     |              numbers in the current FidoNet nodelist


         The following flags define modem protocols supported:

            Flag    Meaning

     |      V21     ITU-T V21      300 bps full duplex
     |      V22     ITU-T V22     1200 bps full duplex
     |      V29     ITU-T V29     9600 bps half duplex
     |      V32     ITU-T V32     9600 bps full duplex
     |      V32b    ITU-T V32bis 14400 bps full duplex
     |      V33     ITU-T V33
     |      V34     ITU-T V34    28800 bps full duplex

            H96     Hayes V9600
            HST     USR Courier HST up to 9600
     |      H14     USR Courier HST up to 14400
     |      H16     USR Courier HST up to 16800
            MAX     Microcom AX/96xx series
            PEP     Packet Ensemble Protocol
     |      CSP     Compucom Speedmodem
     |      ZYX     Zyxel series
     |      VFC     V.Fast Class
     |      V32T    V.32 Terbo

            NOTE:   Many V22 modems also support Bell 212A.

         If no modem flag is given, Bell 212A is assumed for 1200 bps
         systems, ITU-T V22bis is assumed for 2400 bps systems.


         The following flags define type of error correction available. A
         separate error correction flag should not be used when the error
         correction type can be determined by the modem flag. For
     |   instance, a modem flag of HST implies MNP, V32b implies V32 and
     |   V42b implies V42. Therefore MNP+HST, H14+MNP, H16+MNP, V32+V32b
     |   and V42+V42b flag pairs are redundant and should not be used.

             Flag    Meaning

             MNP     Microcom Networking Protocol error correction
     |       V42     ITU-T LAP-M error correction w/fallback to MNP 1-4
     |       V42b    ITU-T LAP-M error correction w/fallback to MNP 1-5


         The following flags define the type(s) of compression of mail
         packets supported.

             Flag    Meaning

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 24                  18 Nov 1996


             MN      No compression supported

     |       NOTE:   While FidoNet nodes usually exchange mail
     |               using a variety of different file compression
     |               formats negotiated between individual systems, the
     |               presence of this flag indicates the INABILITY TO
     |               RECEIVE MAIL compressed using the SEA ARC version 5
     |               compression format and/or named according to the
     |               ARCmail 0.6 mail bundle naming method. This is, by
     |               convention, the most common mail compression format
     |               in use within FidoNet. The presence of this flag
     |               would normally indicate that all mail should be sent
     |               uncompressed unless there is some overriding
     |               arrangement with the receiving system.

         The following flags indicate the types of file and file update
         requests supported.

             Flag    Meaning

             XA      Bark and WaZOO file/update requests
             XB      Bark file/update requests, WaZOO file requests
     |       XC      Bark file requests, WaZOO file file/update
             XP      Bark file/update requests
             XR      Bark and WaZOO file requests
             XW      WaZOO file requests
     |       XX      WaZOO file/update requests


         The following flag defines gateways to other domains (mail
         networks).

             Flag    Meaning

             Gx..x   Gateway to domain 'x..x', where 'x..x` is a string
                     of alphanumeric characters.

             NOTE:   Valid values for 'x..x' are assigned by the FidoNet
     |               International Coordinator or the person appointed as
     |               Internetworking Coordinator by the FidoNet
     |               International Coordinator. Current valid values of
                     'x..x' may usually be found in the notes at the end
     |               of the current FidoNet nodelist. The most common
     |               gateway flag is "GUUCP", to denote a gateway to the
     |               Internet mail system that gates on behalf of the
     |               fidonet.org internet domain.


         The following flags define the dedicated mail periods supported.
         They have the form "#nn" or "!nn" where nn is the UTC hour the
         mail period begins, '#' indicates Bell 212A compatibility, and '!'
         indicates incompatibility with Bell 212A.

             Flag    Meaning

     |       #01     Zone 5 mail hour (01:00 - 02:00 UTC)
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 25                  18 Nov 1996


             #02     Zone 2 mail hour (02:30 - 03:30 UTC)
     |       #03     Zone 4 mail hour (08:00 - 09:00 UTC)
             #09     Zone 1 mail hour (09:00 - 10:00 UTC)
             #18     Zone 3 mail hour (18:00 - 19:00 UTC)
     |       #20     Zone 6 mail hour (20:00 - 21:00 UTC)

             NOTE:   When applicable, the mail period flags may be strung
                     together with no intervening commas, e.g.. "#02#09"
     |               or "!02!09". Only mail hours other than that
                     standard within a node's zone should be given. Since
                     observance of mail hour within one's zone is
                     mandatory, it should not be indicated.


         The following flag defines user-specific values. If present,
         this flag MUST be the last flag present in a nodelist entry.

             Flag    Meaning

             Ux..x   A user-specified string, which may contain any
                     alphanumeric character except blanks. This string
                     may contain one to thirty-two characters of
                     information that may be used to add user-defined
                     data to a specific nodelist entry.

     |       NOTE:   Ux..x flags are the mechanism by which new flags may
     |               be experimentally introduced into the nodelist for a
     |               trial period to assess their worth. They are
     |               therefore of a temporary nature, and after their
     |               introduction they are eventually either promoted
     |               to a non-U flag or dropped from use altogether.

         The FTSC recognizes that the FidoNet International Coordinator is
         the ultimate authority over what appears in the FidoNet nodelist.
         Also, FTSC is by definition a deliberative body, and adding or
         changing a flag may take a considerable amount of time.
         Therefore, the FidoNet International Coordinator may temporarily
         make changes or additions to the flags as defined in this
         document. The FidoNet International Coordinator will then consult
         with FTSC over the changes needed to this document to reflect
         these temporary changes.


         The following are examples of nodelist data lines:

      Host,102,SOCALNET,Los_Angeles_CA,Richard_Martz,1-213-874-9484,2400,XP
      ,101,Rainbow_Data,Culver_City_CA,Don_Brauns,1-213-204-2996,2400,


     | THE NODEDIFF

     |   With more than thirty-five thousand nodes as of this date (1996),
     |   the nodelist, even in archive form, is a document of substantial
     |   size. Since distribution of the nodelist occurs via electronic
         file transfer, this file is NOT routinely distributed. Instead,
     |   when a new nodelist is prepared weekly, it is compared with the
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 26                  18 Nov 1996


         previous week's nodelist, and a file containing only the
         differences is created and distributed.

     |   The distribution difference file, called NODEDIFF.nnn, where nnn
         is the day-of-year of publication, is actually an editing script
         which will transform the previous week's nodelist into the
         current nodelist. A definition of its format follows:

         The first line of NODEDIFF.nnn is an exact copy of the first line
     |   of LAST WEEK'S nodelist (i.e. the first line of the nodelist to
     |   which the current difference file applies). This is used as a
         first-level confidence check to insure that the correct file is
         being edited. The second and subsequent lines are editing
         commands and data.

         There are three editing commands and all have the same format:

       <command><number>

         <command> is a 1 letter command, one of A, C, or D.

         <number> is a decimal number greater than zero, and defines the
         number of lines to be operated on by the command. Each command
         appears on a line by itself. The commands have the following
         meanings:

             Ann     Add the following nn lines to the output file.
             Cnn     Copy nn unchanged lines from the input to the output
                     file.
             Dnn     Delete (or skip) nn lines from the input file.

         The following illustrate how the first few lines of a
     |   hypothetical NODEDIFF.213 might look:

             ;A Friday, July 25, 1986 -- Day number 206 : 27712
             D2
             A2
             ;A Friday, August 1, 1986 -- Day number 213 : 05060
             ;A
             C5

         This fragment illustrates all three editing commands. The first
         line is the first line from the previous nodelist, NODELIST.206.
         The next line says "delete the first two lines" from
         NODELIST.206. These are the identification line and the line
         following it. The next command says "add the next two lines" to
         NODELIST.213 at the "current" location. The two data lines are
         followed by a command which says "copy five unchanged lines" from
         NODELIST.206 to NODELIST.213. Notice that the first line added
     |   will ALWAYS contain the new nodelist CRC, so that the software
     |   applying the changes to the old nodelist may check the result of
     |   its editing.

         Since only the differences will be distributed, it is important
         to insure the accuracy of the newly created nodelist. This is the
         function of the CRC mentioned above. It is sufficient for a
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 27                  18 Nov 1996


         program designed to perform the above edits to pick the CRC value
         from the first line added to the output file, then compute the
         CRC of the rest of the output file. If the two CRCs do not agree,
         one of the input files has been corrupted. If they do agree, the
         probability is very high (but not 100%) that the output file is
         accurate.

         For actual distribution, NODEDIFF.nnn is packed into an archive
     |   file named NODEDIFF.?nn, where 'nn' are the last two digits of
     |   day-of-year, and '?' indicates the compression format used.


     | NODELIST COMPILATION

     |   This section is included for tutorial reasons and is not intended
     |   as a definition of any specific method by which FidoNet MUST
     |   compile its weekly nodelist. It merely represents an attempt to
     |   document the method by which it currently does so. It is intended
     |   to be explanatory, and seeks to answer commonly asked questions,
     |   such as how the nodelist is compiled and where the information
     |   comes from, why the nodelists used in different FidoNet zones are
     |   not the same document, and why the difference file generated for
     |   use in one FidoNet zone cannot be applied to the nodelist
     |   generated for use in a different zone, even though the week
     |   numbers match.

     |   Nodelists are compiled via a distributed method, which follows
     |   the same structure as the FidoNet coordinator hierarchy. At the
     |   lowest level, network coordinators maintain a list of the nodes
     |   in their network and are responsible for the addition, removal
     |   and correction of individual node's listings in their "segment"
     |   (as portions of the full nodelist are called). In some larger
     |   networks, it is common for this job to be shared with hub
     |   coordinators appointed by the net coordinator, though the
     |   responsibility for those hub segments still remains with the
     |   network coordinator.

     |   At a nominated day during the week, before the regional level
     |   segment is submitted to the zone coordinator, individual net
     |   coordinators submit their segments to the regional coordinator
     |   who subsequently compiles these segments and transmits the merged
     |   copy to the zone coordinator. These are combined by the zone
     |   coordinator with the separate segments of other zones and
     |   compiled into that zone's version of the world nodelist. This
     |   world nodelist is then compared with the previous week's version,
     |   a difference file is generated and subsequently distributed
     |   throughout the zone.

     |   In some cases, in the interest of saving in transmission times
     |   and therefore costs, the compilation process itself may be better
     |   served by the submission of DIFFERENCE FILES rather than full
     |   net- or region-level segments. Each coordinator therefore retains
     |   a copy of the previously submitted segments and applies
     |   difference files to those to derive the new one. This process is
     |   exactly identical to the NODEDIFF/NODELIST scenario described
     |   earlier in this document, with the same first line and CRC
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 28                  18 Nov 1996


     |   validation method used to guard the integrity of the nodelist
     |   segments.

     |   For a number of reasons, it is important that publication of the
     |   nodelist be as timely as possible. These reasons include: the
     |   nodelist is a definitive list of valid FidoNet addresses that may
     |   receive mail, and must therefore be as correct and up-to-date as
     |   possible to save nodes the unnecessary expense of mail routed to
     |   possibly non-existing addresses; the nodelist contains the list
     |   of telephone numbers that may be called by any user of the
     |   FidoNet nodelist and should therefore be accurate so as not to
     |   unduly annoy owners of those phone numbers should a listed node
     |   go down and an unsuspecting telephone subscriber inherit the same
     |   telephone number.

     |   Given this constraint, the expense of international calls and the
     |   fact that FidoNet is a worldwide network that exists in many time
     |   zones, it may be unreasonable to expect the compilation of the
     |   nodelist to be delayed until each zone coordinator can transmit
     |   their most up-to-date zone segment to a central authority for
     |   compilation and subsequent redistribution in any week. For the
     |   sake of expedience, each zone instead maintains its own separate
     |   world nodelist which contains a compilation of the current zone's
     |   latest segments and including the most current copy to hand of
     |   all other FidoNet zone's segments. The zone level nodelist
     |   generated each week by each zone coordinator is then transmitted
     |   to all other zone coordinators for inclusion into their separate
     |   world nodelist as timing permits.

     |   In theory, then, the only difference between nodelists
     |   distributed in each zone in any week are accounted for by timing
     |   differences in the exchange of each zone's separate segment. In
     |   practice, other constraints may interfere with timeliness, such
     |   as the difficulty and expense of international telephonic
     |   communications. Also, another point of variance is introduced by
     |   the fact that each zone usually includes its own zone segment
     |   first into its world nodelist to assist - amongst other things -
     |   software that uses the nodelist for index generation. Some
     |   software in common use in FidoNet indexes the nodelist according
     |   to its sequential order (e.g. version 5 and 6 compiled nodelist
     |   formats), and including the current zone first before others will
     |   have a beneficial effect on software performance.

      -30-

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 29                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                            COORDINATORS CORNER
     =================================================================


     Nodelist-statistics as seen from Zone-2 for day 320
     By Ward Dossche, 2:292/854
        ZC/2

      +----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
      |Zone|Nl-292|Nodelist-299|Nodelist-306|Nodelist-313|Nodelist-320|%%|
      +----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
      |  1 | 11666|11555  -111 |11332  -223 |11332     0 |11127  -205 |37|
      |  2 | 16356|16324   -32 |16307   -17 |16157  -150 |16300   143 |54|
      |  3 |   956|  954    -2 |  954     0 |  942   -12 |  929   -13 | 3|
      |  4 |   620|  620     0 |  624     4 |  620    -4 |  620     0 | 2|
      |  5 |    97|   97     0 |   95    -2 |   95     0 |   95     0 | 0|
      |  6 |  1020| 1020     0 | 1007   -13 | 1007     0 |  999    -8 | 3|
      +----+------+------------+------------+------------+------------+--+
           | 30715|30570  -145 |30319  -251 |30153  -166 |30070   -83 |
           +------+------------+------------+------------+------------+

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 30                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                                 NET HUMOR
     =================================================================


     From: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@novia.net>
     To: "Baker, Christopher" <cbaker84@digital.net (Christopher Baker)>
     Date: Mon, 11 Nov 96 09:38:41 -0500
     Reply-To: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@novia.net>
     Subject: Fwd: (Fwd) Announcing C+- [humor]

     ==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==================
     >From: "Joel Shapiro" <joel@dragon.princeton.edu>
     >Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:14:28 -0500
     >>Subject: (Fwd) Announcing C+- [humor]

     Some more good geek humor . . .

     --- Forwarded mail from "Hugo Simao" <hugo@dragon.Princeton.EDU>

     From: "Hugo Simao" <hugo@dragon.Princeton.EDU>
     Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 14:33:46 -0500
     To: joel@dragon.Princeton.EDU, tassio@watson.ibm.com, hbr@bear.com
     Subject: (Fwd) Announcing C+- [humor]

     --- Forwarded mail from "Steve Sashihara"<SSashihara@princeton.com>

     From: "Steve Sashihara"<SSashihara@princeton.com>
     Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 10:43:46 -0400
     Subject: Announcing C+- [humor]


                   Announcing: C+- (Pronounced "C More or Less")

                   Unlike C++, C+- is a subject-oriented language.

                   Each C+- class instance, known as a subject, holds
                   hidden members, known as prejudices or undeclared
                   preferences, which are impervious to outside messages,
                   as well as public members known as boasts or claims.
                   The following C operators are overridden as shown:

                   >     better than
                   <     worse than
                   >>    way better than
                   <<    forget it
                   !     not on your life
                   ==    comparable, other things being equal

                   C+- is a strongly typed language based on stereotyping
                   and self-righteous logic.  The Boolean variables TRUE
                   and FALSE (known as constants in less realistic
                   languages) are supplemented with CREDIBLE and DUBIOUS,
                   which are fuzzier than Zadeh's traditional fuzzy
                   categories. All Booleans can be declared with the
                   modifiers strong and weak.  Weak implication is said to
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 31                  18 Nov 1996


                   "preserve deniability" and was added at the request of
                   the DoD to ensure compatibility with future versions of
                   ADA.  Well-formed falsehoods (WFFs) are assignment-
                   compatible with all booleans.  What-if and why-not
                   interactions are aided by the special conditional
                   evenifnot X then Y.

                   C+- supports information hiding and, among friend
                   classes only, rumor sharing.  Borrowing from the Eiffel
                   lexicon, non-friend classes can be killed by arranging
                   contracts.  Note that friendships are intransitive,
                   volatile, and non-Abelian.

                   Operator precedence rules can be suspended with the
                   directive #pragma dwim, known as the "Do what I mean"
                   pragma.

                   ANSIfication will be firmly resisted. C+-'s slogan is
                   "Be Your Own Standard."


                   ----------------------

                   Editor's note: if you even laughed once, you're a fellow
                   nerd.

               Steve Sashihara
               President, Princeton Consultants Inc.
                          2 Research Way, Princeton NJ
                          Phone:  609-987-8787 * Fax: 609-987-0033
                          E-mail: SSashihara@princeton.com * Web:
               http://www.  princeton.com



     ---End of forwarded mail from "Steve
     Sashihara"<SSashihara@princeton.com>

     ---------------------------------------------------------------------
       Hugo P. Simao                                    |>          |>
       Staff, CASTLE Laboratory                         |           |
       Dept. of Civil Eng'g & Operations Research    '-_-_-'     '-_-_-'
       Princeton University                          |_____|     |_____|
       Princeton, NJ  08544  USA                      \   /       \   /
       Phone: 1 (609) 258-6809                        |---|       |---|
       FAX:   1 (609) 258-3796                        | + |_-_-_-_| + |
       E-mail: hugo@dragon.princeton.edu              |   =       =   |
       WWW: http://dragon.princeton.edu               |=    +++++    =|
       Computational And Stochastic Transportation    |_____|||||_____|
       Logistics Engineering Laboratory              | _____|||||_____ |
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------


     ---End of forwarded mail from "Hugo Simao" <hugo@dragon.Princeton.EDU>

     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 32                  18 Nov 1996


     Joel A. Shapiro                                      |>          |>
     Research Assistant, CASTLE Lab                       |           |
     Dept. of Civil Eng'g & Operations Research        '-_-_-'     '-_-_-'
     Princeton University                              |_____|     |_____|
     Princeton, NJ  08544  USA                          \   /       \   /
     Phone:   (609) 258-3839                            |---|       |---|
     Fax:     (609) 258-1270                            | + |_-_-_-_| + |
     E-mail:  joel@dragon.princeton.edu                 |   =       =   |
     WWW:     http://dragon.princeton.edu               |=    +++++    =|
     Computational And Stochastic Transportation        |_____|||||_____|
     Logistics Engineering Laboratory                  | _____|||||_____ |

     "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
     build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying
     to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."
     -Some Smart Guy

     ----------------------------------------------------------------------

     ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================

     -----------------------------------------------------------------


     From: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@monarch.papillion.ne.us>
     To: "Baker, Christopher" <cbaker84@digital.net (Christopher Baker)>
     Date: Sat, 02 Nov 96 11:37:30 -0500
     Reply-To: "Mike Riddle" <mriddle@monarch.papillion.ne.us>
     Subject: Fwd: [Fwd: Deep Thoughts] (fwd)

     ==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE==================
     >Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 23:15:45 -0600
     >To: dwi-lawyers@webspan.com
     >From: rbarzel@telis.org (Ron Barzel) (by way of gil sapir
     <gsapir@interaccess.com>)
     >Subject: [Fwd: Deep Thoughts] (fwd)
     >Reply-To: dwi-lawyers@webspan.com


     Deep Thoughts Contest

       -- From a newspaper contest where entrants were asked to imitate
          "Deep Thoughts by Jack Handey"

          HONORABLE MENTIONS:

       My young son asked me what happens after we die.  I told him we get
       buried under a bunch of dirt and worms eat our bodies.  I guess I
       should have told him the truth--that most of us go to Hell and burn
       eternally--but I didn't want to upset him.

       It sure would be nice if we got a day off for the president's
       birthday, like they do for the queen.  Of course, then we would have
       a lot of people voting for a candidate born on July 3 or December
       26, just for the long weekends.

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 33                  18 Nov 1996


       Democracy is a beautiful thing, except for that part about letting
       just any old yokel vote.

       Home is where the house is.

       Often, when I am reading a good book, I stop and thank my teacher.
       That is, I used to, until she got an unlisted number.

       As you make your way through this hectic world of ours, set aside a
       few minutes each day.  At the end of the year, you'll have a couple
       of days saved up.

       It would be terrible if the Red Cross Bloodmobile got into an
       accident.  No, wait.  That would be good because if anyone needed
       it, the blood would be right there.

       Give me the strength to change the things I can, the grace to accept
       the things I cannot, and a great big bag of money.

       The people who think Tiny Tim is strange are the same ones who think
       it odd that I drive without pants.

       For centuries, people thought the moon was made of green cheese.
       Then the astronauts found that the moon is really a big hard rock.
       That's what happens to cheese when you leave it out.

       Think of the biggest number you can.  Now add five.  Then, imagine
       if you had that many Twinkies.  Wow, that's five more than the
       biggest number you could come up with!

       I bet living in a nudist colony takes all the fun out of Halloween.

       The only stupid question is the one that is never asked, except
       maybe "Don't you think it is about time you audited my return?" or
       "Isn't is morally wrong to give me a warning when, in fact, I was
       speeding?"

       Once, I wept for I had no shoes.  Then I came upon a man who had no
       feet.  So I took his shoes.  I mean, it's not like he really needed
       them, right?

       When I go to heaven, I want to see my grandpa again.  But he better
       have lost the nose hair and the old-man smell.

       I believe you should live each day as if it is your last, which is
       why I don't have any clean laundry because, come on, who wants to
       wash clothes on the last day of their life?

       I often wonder how come John Tesh isn't as popular a singer as some
       people think he should be.  Then, I remember it's because he sucks.

       Whenever I start getting sad about where I am in my life, I think
       about the last words of my favorite uncle: "A truck!"

       If you really want to impress people with your computer literacy,
       add the words "dot com" to the end of everything you say, dot com.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 34                  18 Nov 1996


       I like to go down to the dog pound and pretend that I've found my
       dog.  Then I tell them to kill it anyway because I already gave away
       all of his stuff.  Dog people sure don't have a sense of humor.

       THIRD RUNNER UP

       I don't know about you, but I enjoy watching paint dry.  I imagine
       that the wet paint is a big freshwater lake that is the only source
       of water for some tiny cities by the lake.  As the lake gets drier,
       the population gets more desperate, and sometimes there are water
       riots.  Once there was a big fire and everyone died.

       SECOND RUNNER UP

       I once heard the voice of God.  It said "Vrrrrmmmmm."  Unless it was
       just a lawn mower.

       FIRST RUNNER UP

       I gaze at the brilliant full moon.  The same one, I think to myself,
       at which Socrates, Aristotle, and Plato gazed.  Suddenly, I imagine
       they appear beside me.  I tell Socrates about the national debate
       over one's right to die and wonder at the constancy of the human
       condition.  I tell Plato that I live in the country that has come
       the closest to Utopia, and I show him a copy of the Constitution.  I
       tell Aristotle that we have found many more than four basic elements
       and I show him a periodic table.  I get a box of kitchen matches and
       strike one.  They gasp with wonder.  We spend the rest of the night
       lighting farts.

       WINNER

       If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize
       world peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be
       until the looting started.

     ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE===================

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 35                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                                  NOTICES
     =================================================================

                                Future History

      1 Dec 1996
        Twelfth Anniversary of FidoNews Volume 1, Issue 1.

     12 Dec 1996
        Constitution Day, Russia

     26 Jan 1997
        Australia Day, Australia.

      6 Feb 1997
        Waitangi Day, New Zealand.

     16 Feb 1997
        Eleventh Anniversary of invention of Echomail by Jeff Rush.

     29 Feb 1997
        Nothing will happen on this day.

     25 May 1997
        Independence Day, Argentina

     11 Jun 1997
        Independence Day, Russia

      1 Dec 1998
        Fifteenth Anniversary of release of Fido version 1 by
        Tom Jennings.

     31 Dec 1999
        Hogmanay, Scotland. The New Year that can't be missed.

     15 Sep 2000
        Sydney (Australia) Summer Olympiad opens.

     -- If YOU have something which you would like to see in this
        Future History, please send a note to the FidoNews Editor.

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 36                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                            FIDONEWS PUBLIC-KEY
     =================================================================


     [this must be copied out to a file starting at column 1 or
      it won't process under PGP as a valid public-key]


     -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
     Version: 2.6.2
     Comment: Clear-signing is Electronic Digital Authenticity!

     -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


     Pending a formal decision about including 'encrypted' material inside
     FidoNews from the Zone Coordinator Council, the guts of the FidoNews
     public-key have been removed from this listing.

     File-request FNEWSKEY from 1:1/23 [1:18/14] or download it from the
     Rights On! BBS at 1-904-409-7040 anytime except 0100-0130 ET and Zone
     1 ZMH at 1200-9600+ HST/V32B.

     This section will contain only this disclaimer and instructions until
     a ZCC decision is forwarded to the Editor.

     Sorry for any inconvenience.

     -----------------------------------------------------------------

     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 37                  18 Nov 1996


     =================================================================
                           FIDONEWS INFORMATION
     =================================================================

     ------- FIDONEWS MASTHEAD AND CONTACT INFORMATION -------

     Editor: Christopher Baker

     Editors Emeritii: Thom Henderson, Dale Lovell,
                       Vince Perriello, Tim Pozar,
                       Tom Jennings, Sylvia Maxwell,
                       Donald Tees

     "FidoNews Editor"
         FidoNet  1:1/23
         BBS  1-904-409-7040,  300/1200/2400/14400/V.32bis/HST(ds)

      more addresses:
         Christopher Baker -- 1:18/14, cbaker84@digital.net
                                       cbak.rights@opus.global.org

     (Postal Service mailing address)
         FidoNews Editor
         P.O. Box 471
         Edgewater, FL 32132-0471
         U.S.A.


     voice:  1-904-409-3040 [1400-2100 ET only, please]
                            [1800-0100 UTC/GMT]

     ------------------------------------------------------

     FidoNews is published weekly by and for the members of the FIDONET
     INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR ELECTRONIC MAIL system.  It is a compilation
     of individual articles contributed by their authors or their
     authorized agents.  The contribution of articles to this compilation
     does not diminish the rights of the authors.  OPINIONS EXPRESSED in
     these articles ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS and not necessarily those of
     FidoNews.

     Authors retain copyright on individual works; otherwise FidoNews is
     Copyright 1996 Christopher Baker.  All rights reserved.  Duplication
     and/or distribution permitted for noncommercial purposes only.  For
     use in other circumstances, please contact the original authors, or
     the Editor.

                            =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

     OBTAINING COPIES: The most recent issue of FidoNews in electronic
     form may be obtained from the FidoNews Editor via manual download or
     file-request, or from various sites in the FidoNet and Internet.
     PRINTED COPIES may be obtained by sending SASE to the above postal
     address.  File-request FIDONEWS for the current Issue.  File-request
     FNEWS for the current month in one archive.  Or file-request specific
     back Issue filenames in distribution format [FNEWSDnn.LZH] for a
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 38                  18 Nov 1996


     particular Issue.  Monthly Volumes are available as FNWSmmmy.ZIP
     where mmm = three letter month [JAN - DEC] and y = last digit of the
     current year [6], i.e., FNWSMAY6.ZIP for all the Issues from May 96.

     Annual volumes are available as FNEWSn.ZIP where n = the Volume number
     1 - 12 for 1984 - 1995, respectively. Annual Volume archives range in
     size from 48K to 1.2M.


     INTERNET USERS: FidoNews is available via:

                          http://www.fidonet.org/fidonews.htm
                          ftp://ftp.fidonet.org/pub/fidonet/fidonews/
                          ftp://ftp.aminet.org/pub/aminet/comm/fido/

     You can read the current FidoNews Issue in HTML format at:

                          http://www.geocities.com/athens/6894/

     STAR SOURCE for ALL Past Issues via FTP and file-request -
     Available for FReq from 1:396/1 or by anonymous FTP from:

                          ftp://ftp.sstar.com/fidonet/fnews/

     Each yearly archive also contains a listing of the Table-of-Contents
     for that year's issues.  The total set is currently about 11 Megs.

                                 =*=*=*=

     The current week's FidoNews and the FidoNews public-key are now also
     available almost immediately after publication on the Editor's new
     homepage on the World Wide Web at:

                  http://ddi.digital.net/~cbaker84/fidonews.html

     There are also links there to jim barchuk's HTML FidoNews source and
     to John Souvestre's FTP site for the archives. There is also an email
     link for sending in an article as message text. Drop on over.

                            =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

     A PGP generated public-key is available for the FidoNews Editor from
     1:1/23 [1:18/14] by file-request for FNEWSKEY or by download from
     Rights On! BBS at 1-904-409-7040 as FIDONEWS.ASC in File Area 18.  It
     is also posted twice a month into the PKEY_DROP Echo available on the
     Zone 1 Echomail Backbone.

                                *=*=*=*=*

     Anyone interested in getting a copy of the INTERNET GATEWAY FAQ may
     file-request GISFAQ.ZIP from 1:133/411.0, or send an internet message
     to fidofaq@gisatl.fidonet.org.  No message or text or subject is
     necessary.  The address is a keyword that will trigger the automated
     response.  People wishing to send inquiries directly to David Deitch
     should now mail to fidonet@gisatl.fidonet.org rather than the
     previously listed address.
     FIDONEWS 13-47               Page 39                  18 Nov 1996


                                *=*=*=*=*

     SUBMISSIONS: You are encouraged to submit articles for publication in
     FidoNews. Article submission requirements are contained in the file
     ARTSPEC.DOC, available from the FidoNews Editor, or file-requestable
     from 1:1/23 [1:18/14] as file "ARTSPEC.DOC".  ALL Zone Coordinators
     also have copies of ARTSPEC.DOC. Please read it.

     "Fido", "FidoNet" and the dog-with-diskette are U.S. registered
     trademarks of Tom Jennings, P.O. Box 410923, San Francisco, CA 94141,
     and are used with permission.

             "Disagreement is actually necessary,
              or we'd all have to get in fights
              or something to amuse ourselves
              and create the requisite chaos."
                                -Tom Jennings

      -30-


     -----------------------------------------------------------------

